Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Health Policy Technol ; 11(2): 100635, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1814461

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To describe the evolution of the national vaccination programme in Norway and how changes in national policy informed by risk and equity shaped international vaccine debates, public trust and vaccine hesitancy. Methods: Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. Results: Process equity founded on social solidarity was central to the approach taken to vaccination in Norway but within the context of a very low level of COVID-19 Infection. Conclusions: In the context of Norway with very low levels of infection, the risks associated with vaccine side effects were of a similar order to the risk of infection which led to an early decision to exclude the AstraZeneca vaccine and limit access to the Janssen vaccine. Public trust in the way the state managed the changes in the vaccination programme resulted in very limited public resistance to the vaccine programme, high levels of vaccine uptake and an acceptance of delays associated with the exclusion of two approved vaccines. Vaccination rates among Norwegian residents born in Eastern Europe were significantly lower than both foreign born and Norwegian born residents.

2.
Health Policy Technol ; 11(2): 100634, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1800035
3.
Health Policy Technol ; 9(4): 397-398, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-813600
4.
Health Policy Technol ; 9(4): 663-672, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the impact and policy response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Norway and the implications this has for future policy development and Norwegian society. METHODS: Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. RESULTS: Three different agendas motivated Norwegian policy: stemming the spread of the virus domestically, mitigating the impact on the economy and addressing the social costs of the policy response. CONCLUSIONS: The oil and gas industry and the Sovereign Wealth Fund have permitted Norway to manage the costs of the pandemic. But may also lead to a shift in government priorities in health, social and economic policy.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL